Radheshyam Narayan Prasad v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48357 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-13 Year-2019 Thana- MAHILA PS District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1.
RADHESHYAM NARAYAN PRASAD Son of Late Rajeshwar Prasad Resident of Village - Tej Pratap Nagar (Setu Nagar), Anishabad, P.S.- Beyur, District- Patna (Bihar) 2.
Shobha Devi Wife of Radheshyam Narayan Prasad Resident of Village - Tej Pratap Nagar (Setu Nagar), Anishabad, P.S.- Beyur, District- Patna (Bihar) 3.
Prashant Kumar Son of Radheshyam Narayan Prasad Resident of Village - Tej Pratap Nagar (Setu Nagar), Anishabad, P.S.- Beyur, District- Patna (Bihar) ... ... Petitioners
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Shweta Sumar Wife of Rahul Kumar, D/O - Brajesh Kumar Sinha Resident of Village - Kamlanagar Smirti, P.S.- Satendra Nagar, P.S. and DistrictAurangabad ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. S.N.P. Sinha, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Rashmi Bharti, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 05-08-2019 Petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 13 of 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 420, 354, 498A, 379, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.
Allegation against the petitioners, who happen to be father-in-law, mother-in-law and Dewar of the informant, is of torturing the informant with respect to demand. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48357 of 2019(2) dt.05-08-2019 2/2 that there is general allegation of demand of car and of assault and no specific allegation has been attributed against any of them and they are ready to co-operate in the investigation and during trial.
Heard learned APP also.
In view of above facts and circumstances, let petitioners, in the event of arrest or surrender, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Aurangabad, in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 13 of 2019, corresponding to G.R.No. 643 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and further condition is that one of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned and further petitioners have to co-operate in the investigation.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U T