Nautan Prakhand Fishermen Cooperative Society Limited v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL REVIEW No.284 of 2017 Arising out of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7470 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.

Nautan Prakhand Fishermen Cooperative Society Limited, District West Champaran.

2.

Sushil Choudhary, Son of Shri Kashi Choudhary, Secretary, Nautan Prakhand Fishermen Cooperative Society Limited, Resident of VillagePurandarpur, Police Station- Nautan, District-West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

The Chief Election Officer, Bihar State Election Authority, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The District Magistrate-Cum-District Election Officer, District West Champaran.

4.

The District Co-operative Officer-Cum-District Deputy Election Officer, District West Champaran.

5.

The Block Development officer-Cum-Election Officer, Nautan Prakhand Fishermen Cooperative Society Limited, District West Champaran. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the State :

Mr. Dinesh Maharaj, AC to AAG- 11 For the Election Authority :

Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER 12-10-2022 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner.

2. Mr. Dinesh Maharaj, learned AC to AAG- 11 the State and Mr. Mukesh Kumar, learned counsel for the Bihar State Election Authority are present.

3. Learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 submits that the present application sought review of order dated 07.07.2017 passed in CWJC No. 7470 of 2017. Learned counsel submits that the same related to preparation of voter list but

Patna High Court C. REV. No.284 of 2017(3) dt.12-10-2022 2/2 subsequent to the same the election was also held and petitioner lost the election and now even the term of the body had expired. Thus, it was submitted that the matter has become infructuous.

4. Taking into account the submission of learned counsel for the respondent no. 2, the present application stands disposed of as infructuous.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) Anand Kr.

U