Vikram Singh @ Vikrama Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51308 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-32 Year-2022 Thana- ADHAOURA District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== VIKRAM SINGH @ VIKRAMA SINGH S/o Late Daroga Singh R/o VillageSari, P.S.- Adhaura, District- Kaimur at Bhabua. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashutosh Tripathy, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Madhuri Lata, A.P.P ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-01-2023 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of three weeks from today.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable u/s 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

As per the prosecution case, on information, police came and recovered two country-made gun from the kothi of the house of the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51308 of 2022(2) dt.11-01-2023 2/2 petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated at para 3 of the bail petition. During the time the recovery the petitioner was not present at his house. Section 100 has not been complied. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner by submitting that there is recovery of two country-made guns from the conscious possession of the petitioner.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as the fact that there is recovery of two country-made guns from the conscious possession of the petitioner, I am of the view that no case for grant of anticipatory bail is made out. The petition is rejected and the petitioner is directed to surrender to the Court below within four weeks from the date of this order and the Court below will consider the prayer of bail of the petitioner without being prejudice by this order. (Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T