Chhatu Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.51631 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -246 Year- 2017 Thana -PIRPAINTI District- BHAGALPUR ====================================================== Chhatu Rai Son of late Baijnath Roy Resident of Village- Basantpur, P.S. Pirpainty, District- Bhagalpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Indeshwari Prasad Mandal, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Matloob Rab, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in Pirpainty P.S. Case No. 246/2017 corresponding to Sessions Trial No. 125/2018, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304(B), 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner and his family member is that they killed the daughter of informant and concealed her dead-body due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He is father-in-law. Petitioner is living separately and has no concern with the family affairs of the deceased.

Petitioner is in custody since 12.09.2017.

Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner above-

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51631 of 2018 (2) dt.04-10-2018 2/2 named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional District & Sessions Judge 7th, Bhagalpur in connection with Pirpainty P.S. Case No. 246/2017 corresponding to Sessions Trial No. 125/2018, subject to the conditions:

(1.) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2.) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bonds.

(3.) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Vinita/- U T