Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32769/2016bail granted

Manoj Kumar @ Manoj Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

2016-09-17Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.32769 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -646 Year- 2015 Thana -HILSA District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ======================================================

1. Manoj Kumar @ Manoj Mahto Son of Rajeshwar Mahto Resident of Village- Bariyarpur, P.S.- Chiksaura, District- Nalanda. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Navin Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-09-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is in custody in a case registered under Sections 307,302, 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 27 of Arms Act and 10 (29)(i), 14, 16,18,20 UAPA Act.

It is alleged by the informant that on 2.12.2015 at about 6 P.M., the father of the informant had gone to the shop of Vishwajit Hardware and at about 6.30 P.M. he heard sound of firing and when he reached on shop he saw that two persons were fleeing away after shooting his father saying "Naxal Jindabad" . After that he said that his father had died and the owner of shop, namely, Vishwajeet Kumar was injured. The cause of occurrence is that the Chief Commander of P.L.F.I, namely, Ganesh Shankar had demanded Rangdari from Vishwajeet Kumar.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32769 of 2016 (3) dt.17-09-2016 2/2 It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 21.03.2016. Charge sheet has been submitted in this case. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. Except suspicion there is no other material to suggest the implication of the petitioner. There is no eye witness to the alleged occurrence nor any circumstantial evidence.

On behalf of the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the FIR.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let, above named petitioner, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Hilsa (Nalanda) in connection with Hilsa P.S.Case No.646 of 2015.

(Sudhir Singh, J) singh/- U T