Sunny Kumar @ Sanni Kumar @ Sanny Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50433 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-551 Year-2025 Thana- PAROO District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Sunny Kumar @ Sanni Kumar @ Sanny Kumar S/o Late Jitendra Ram R/o vill- Firozpur, Ps- Paru @ Paroo, District- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Prasoon Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Upendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 22-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Paroo P.S. Case No. 551 of 2025 instituted for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3) & 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3.

The prosecution story is that the petitioner, along with other co-accused, assaulted the informant and his family members with lathis and an iron rod over a dispute, causing injuries to three persons. It is further alleged that one co-accused robbed Rs. 5,000/- from the informant while another threatened the victims with a country-made pistol before all the accused

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50433 of 2026(2) dt.22-07-2026 2/3 fled the place of occurrence.

4.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 22.03.2026. Petitioner bears one criminal antecedent, as per disclosure made in paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

5.

It has been further submitted by the petitioner's counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. From perusal of the FIR, it would transpire that petitioner allegedly assaulted the father of the informant, due to which he sustained injury. It is submission of the petitioner's counsel that injury is found to be grievous in nature. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Charge sheet has already been submitted in this case. 6.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 7.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner and charge sheet being submitted, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

8.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50433 of 2026(2) dt.22-07-2026 3/3 below/concerned Court in connection with Paroo P.S. Case No. 551 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T