← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/15883/2019disposed

Nand Kishore Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2019-08-14Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15883 of 2019 ====================================================== Nand Kishore Singh, aged about 59 years, Son of Late Ram Lakhan Singh, resident of Village and Post Jamanganj, Police Station and BlockMakhdumpur, District- Jehanabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Panchayati Raj, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The District Magistrate, Jehanabad.

3.

The District Panchayat Officer, Jehanabad.

4.

The District Accounts Officer, Jehanabad.

5.

The Block Development Officer, Ratani Faridpur, District- Jehanabad. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Roy, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Ms. Archana Meenakshee (GP-6) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 14-08-2019 The petitioner has approached this Court for a direction to the concerned respondents, especially the District Magistrate, Jehanabad for grant of benefit of 1st A.C.P. to him with effect from 30.11.2006 and the 2nd A.C.P. from 01.01.2016.

2. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that despite the entitlement of the petitioner for being paid such financial benefits, he has not been paid the

Patna High Court CWJC No.15883 of 2019 dt.14-08-2019 2/2 same without any reason and he is to superannuate by October, 2019.

3. Earlier representations of the petitioner before the concerned authorities including the District Magistrate, Jehanabad has yielded no result.

4. Under the aforesaid circumstances, the petitioner is directed to make a fresh representation before the District Magistrate, Jehanabad within a period of two weeks from today, who, on receipt of the same, after verifying the facts and ascertaining the entitlement of the petitioner, shall pass a reasoned order in accordance with law within a further period of four weeks thereafter.

5. If the claim of the petitioner is found to be tenable, necessary sequel order shall also be passed by the concerned respondent within the aforesaid period.

6. With the aforesaid observation/direction, the writ petition stands disposed off.

Praveen-II/- (Ashutosh Kumar, J) AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 19.08.2019 Transmission Date N/A