Raghubansh Narayan Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar Through Its Principal Secretary Mr. Amrit Lal Meena, Cooperative Department, G
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1711 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10922 of 2016 ====================================================== 1.
Raghubansh Narayan Singh and Ors Son of Late Ramphal Singh resident of village - Vyas Chak Chak Vyas, P.O. and P.S.- Goraul, District - Vaishali. 2.
Shailendra Kumar Pandey Son of Late Nawal Kishore Pandey resident of village and P.O. Akhtiyarpur, P.S. Rai Patera, District - Vaishali. 3.
Krishnadeo Singh Son of Late Satyanarain Singh resident of village P.O. Chak Shingar, P.S. Judawanpur, District - Vaishali. 4.
Jagal Paswan Son of Sri Raghu Paswan resident of village - Goraul, P.S. Mahua, District - Vaishali.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar through Its Principal Secretary Mr. Amrit Lal Meena, Cooperative Department, Govt. of Bihar.
2.
Mr. Narendra Prasad Mandal, the Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Vaishali District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. Hajipur through its Managing Director Mr. Shas 4.
Mr. Shashi Bhushan Kumar, the Managing Director, the Vaishali District Central Co-operative Bank Lt 5.
The Board of Directors of the Vaishali District Co-operative Bank Ltd. Hajipur through its Chairman ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Lakshmi Kant Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.R.B.P. Yadav- AAG-11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 17-07-2023 Heard the parties.
This application has been preferred for compliance of the order dated 03.02.2017 passed in CWJC No. 10922 of 2016. A show-cause has been filed on behalf of the opposite party nos. 3 to 5 and the learned counsel has taken this Court to paragraph nos. 7,8 & 9 to show that the order of the writ Court
Patna High Court MJC No.1711 of 2017(4) dt.17-07-2023 2/2 has been complied with in its true letter and spirit and further in paragraph-12, it has been stated that the same stands fully complied with.
The show-cause filed in the year 2018 and do not rebutted by the learned counsel for the petitioner. The MJC No. 1711 of 2017 stands disposed of.
However, the petitioners, if still have any grievance, have always liberty to agitate the same before an appropriate forum.
(Rajiv Roy, J) Mayank/Jagdish U