← Library
Patna High CourtL.P.A/1448/2014disposed

The United India Insurance Co. Ltd. And ORS v. Rana Ranjeet Singh

2018-07-23Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad,The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1448 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.476 of 2012 ======================================================

1. The United India Insurance Co. Ltd. through its Chairman Cum Managing Director, Head Office, 24, Whites Road, Chennai - 600014

2. The General Manager (Personnel), United India Insurance Co Ltd., Head Office, 24, Whites Road, Chennai - 600014

3. The Deputy General Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Head Office, 24, Whites Road, Chennai - 600014

4. The Manager (United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Head Office, 24, Whites Road, Chennai - 600014), Regional Office, Chanakya Tower, (3rd Floor), R Block, Patna - 800001

5. The Chief Regional Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Regional Office, Chanakya Towers, Beerchand Patel Path, RBlock, Patna - 800001 ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

Rana Ranjeet Singh S/o Late Bankey Bihari Singh At Present Residing at House No. 2H/45, Bahadurpur Housing Colony, P.S. - Agam Kuan Town and District - Patna - 800026 ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

For the Respondent/s :

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 23-07-2018 None appears for the appellants. Counsel for the respondent is present.

Keeping in view the aforesaid and the statement made by learned counsel for the respondent employee that the entire order passed by the Writ Court has been complied with, payments have been made and the respondent employee has

Patna High Court LPA No.1448 of 2014 dt.23-07-2018 2/2 retired and thereafter the payments have also been made to him, we see no reason to make any indulgence into the matter. Keeping the legal question open to be considered at an appropriate stage in a subsequent case, for the present, we find no reason to interfere into the matter.

The Letters Patent Appeal stands disposed of. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) P.K.P./-Shukla AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 28.07.2018 Transmission Date