Meena Devi And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.3100 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -420 Year- 2018 Thana -TURKAULIYA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN (MOTIHARI) ===========================================================
1. Meena Devi, Wife of Rajesh Ray.
2. Bigan Kumari, D/o Bhukhal Ray.
3. Shanti Devi @ Kanti Devi, W/o Ajay Ray.
4. Parvita Kumari @ Pravita Kumari, D/o Raja Ray. All are resident of VillageKaparsandi, P.S.- Turkauliya, District- East Champaran. .... .... Appellant/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binay Krishna, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 27-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer for bail vide order dated 01.08.2018 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-VII-cum-Special Judge Excise, East Champaran, Motihari, in connection with Turkauliya Police Station Case No.420 of 2018, registered under Sections 147/148/149/341/323/332/353/307/379/435 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act, Section 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 and Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities)
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3100 of 2018 dt.27-08-2018 P2/ Act, 1989.
Considering the general and omnibus nature of allegation and the fact that the appellants are female having no criminal antecedents, let the appellants, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, with condition that the appellants shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellants. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and appeal is allowed.
(Birendra Kumar, J) Mkr./- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date29.08.2018 Transmission Date 29.08.2018