← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/19442/2014disposed

Phool Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-08-03Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19442 of 2014 ====================================================== Phool Kumari, Wife of Shri Arbind Kumar Resident of Village - Litiyahee, P.S. - Pipra, District - Supaul.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Secretary, Department of Primary-Cum-Adult Education, New Secretariat, Bailey Road, Patna, Bihar. null null

2. The Director, Primary and Adult Education, New Secretariat, Patna, Bihar.

3. The District Magistrate, Supaul.

4. The District Education Officer, Supaul.

5. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Supaul.

6. The Block Development Officer, Supaul.

7. The Block Education Extension Officer, Pipra, District - Supaul.

8. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat, Dinapatti, P.S. - Pipra, District - Supaul.

9. The Mukhiya-Cum-Chairman-Cum Superintendent, Sukh Subidha Samiti Gram Panchayat, Dinapatti, District - Supaul.

10. The Headmaster B.A.M.S. (Baraha Litiyahi), District - Supaul.

11. The Headmaster, Middle School Beldari Block, Pipra, District - Supaul. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Binay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Sc16- Abbas Haider ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 03-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is aggrieved by the decision of the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of State submit that petitioner has a forum available i.e. State Appellate Authority.

Considering the aforesaid, the learned counsel for the

Patna High Court CWJC No.19442 of 2014(2) dt.03-08-2018 2/2 petitioner submit that he may be granted liberty to approach the State Appellate Authority.

In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file appeal before the State Appellate Authority. In case an appeal is filed by the petitioner along with a copy of this order within a period of one month from today, the appellate authority will condone the delay and disposed of the appeal on its own merit, considering the fact that for the last four years, the present writ petition was pending against the decision of the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority.

With the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Rajiv/- U