← Library
Patna High CourtL.P.A/1125/2017dismissed

Saira Tabassum v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-06-18Justice Smt. Nilu Agrawal,Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1125 of 2017 In Civil Revision No.51 of 2015 ====================================================== Saira Tabassum D/o Nijamuddin Ansari, Resident of Mohalla- Berbanna, P.S.- Katihar, District- Katihar.

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Education Officer, Katihar.

4. The District Programme Officer, Katihar.

5. The Block Development Officer, Hasanganj, District- Katihar.

6. The Block Education Officer, Hasanganj, District- Katihar.

7. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Dharua, Hasanganj, District- Katihar.

8. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Dharua, Hasanganj, DistrictKatihar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Pranav Kumar Jha For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey-Aag15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) 18-06-2018 Delay of 287 days is condoned for the reasons indicated in I.A. No. 6984 of 2017. Matter is thereafter taken up on merits.

Heard counsel for the appellant and learned Additional Advocate General for the State.

We have perused the order dated 28.09.2016 passed in Civil Review No.51 of 2015 by the learned single Judge. The narration of facts as taken note of by the learned single Judge in

Patna High Court LPA No.1125 of 2017(3) dt.18-06-2018 2/2 the second paragraph of the said order indicates the factual position as to why the review was not entertainable or a revisit was required.

There is no error apparent in the order passed by the learned single Judge which requires rectification in appeal. Appeal is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) ( Nilu Agrawal, J) Pawan/- U