Ram Vilas Singh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52260 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-749 Year-2023 Thana- TEKARI District- Gaya ====================================================== Ram Vilas Singh Yadav S/o Sohar Yadav R/o Village- Barki Chilmi, P.S.- Amas, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Aryan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 12-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No. 749 of 2023, dated 11.12.2023, lodged under Sections 409, 406 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against three named accused persons, including the present petitioner, with an allegation of criminal breach of trust. Additionally, a case has been filed against the Panchayat Secretary alleging non-availability of documents, measurement book, and planning register.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He further submits that the FIR has been filed with vague and ambiguous
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52260 of 2025(2) dt.12-08-2025 2/3 allegations, neither the scheme allegedly executed by the petitioner has been disclosed, nor is it mentioned which records have not been handed over to the authorities. It has also not been clarified who was responsible for maintaining the register, or whether any loss has been caused to the public exchequer. He further submits that the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court has been pleased to grant anticipatory bail to the other accused persons vide order dated 19.05.2025, passed in Cr. Misc. No. 76437 of 2024. Furthermore, he submits that the criminal antecedent of the petitioner is clean.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner but fairly submits that the Co-ordinate Bench has granted bail to the co-accused persons.
6. As such, in the present facts and circumstances of this case, as well as considering the place of recovery, let the above-named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Trial Court within a period of 4 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) as mentioned in Section 2(1)(d) of the BNSS, 2023 to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VI, Gaya, in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No. 749 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52260 of 2025(2) dt.12-08-2025 3/3 down U/s 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023.
7. It is further directed that the Trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner, and in case it is found at any stage that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the Trial Court shall take steps for cancellation of the petitioner's bail bond. However, the acceptance of the bail bond in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for the purpose of or in the name of verification. (Dr. Anshuman, J.) Aman Kumar/- U T