Ranbir Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.27641 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -19 Year- 2016 Thana -SACHIWALAYA District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Ranbir Mahto son of Dinesh Mahto, resident of Village- Patori Bihra, Police Station- Bihra, District- Saharsa.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajiva Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Anish Chandra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is in custody in a case registered under Sections 467, 468, 471 and 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution story in brief is that five months before, the informant met the petitioner at a tea shop. After taking him in confidence, the petitioner said that you will get government job of Rs. 8000/- per month as a peon in Gardanibagh School, Patna. The petitioner took him to his Sir Kalyan Kumar @ Pappu. It is further alleged that on 7.1.2016 the informant paid Rs. 22,000/- and on 2/3/2016 he paid Rs. 31,000/- to Pappu for his service but no joining letter was provided to him. On suspicion that they are cheaters and they all are cheating the people, he asked Pappu to return back his money of Rs. 53,000/- but Pappu

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27641 of 2016 (3) dt.02-08-2016 2/2 refused to return the money and ousted him from his place. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 05.03.2016. Charge sheet has been submitted in this case. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of the witnesses against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner is alleged to have introduced the informant with co-accused, namely, Pappu. There is no wrongful gain made on the part of the petitioner nor any wrongful loss has been caused to the informant by the petitioner. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the FIR.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, let, above named petitioner, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Patna in connection with Sachiwalaya P.S.Case No. 19 of 2016.

(Sudhir Singh, J) singh/- U T