Rinku Singh @ Manish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49661 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-435 Year-2024 Thana- DINARA District- Rohtas ====================================================== RINKU SINGH @ MANISH KUMAR S/o- Gorakh Nath Singh Resident of Village- Ekrasi Police Station- Bagen Gola District- Buxar at Present VillageBhanpur Police Station- Dinara District-Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Indu Kumari D/o- Saroj Giri R/o- Sarna Mathiya Ps- Dinara Dist- Rohtas at Sasaram ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raghunandan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narsingh Tanti, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Giri, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 115(2), 75, 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and under Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act.

3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on the alleged date and time of occurrence, the named accused persons, including the present petitioner, entered into the house of the informant and started molesting her. When the father of the informant came forward to rescue her, he was assaulted by the accused persons.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49661 of 2025(3) dt.10-11-2025 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on account of land dispute, the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Police after investigation submitted final form against the petitioner and had not sent the petitioner for trial, differing with the same the learned Court below has taken cognizance. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.

5. Learned counsel for the informant along with learned APP for the State opposed the bail petition.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts, clean antecedent of the petitioner and other circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within eight weeks from today, let the petitioner, as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned DASJ-VIICum-Exclusive Special Court (POCSO), Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Dinara P.S. Case No. 435 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) AjayMishra/- U T