Patna High CourtCWJC/6412/2015disposed

Madan Mohan Mishra v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-01-19Mr. Justice Ashwani Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6412 of 2015 =========================================================== Madan Mohan Mishra, son of Late Anuplal Mishra, resident of village- Hattha, Post- Hattha, Police Station- Piyar in the district of Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur.

5. The District Education Officer, Muzaffarpur.

6. The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Muzaffarpur.

7. The Block Education Officer, Bandra, District-Muzaffarpur.

8. The Head Master-cum- Drawing and Disbursing Officer, Middle School, Bandra, District-Muzaffarpur.

9. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sanjay Pandey, G.P.-21 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 19-01-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.

2. The instant application has been filed for commanding the respondents to fix the pension of the petitioner and pay the arrears of pension as well as gratuity.

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Accountant General, Bihar, Patna that after receiving the sanction order from the District Programme Officer (Establishment),

Patna High Court CWJC No.6412 of 2015 dt.19-01-2017 2/2 Muzaffarpur, pension, Gratuity and Commutation has already been authorized in favour of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the aforesaid contention made by the learned counsel for the Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.

5. Regard being had to the fact that the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed, the writ petition is disposed of. (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) Md.S./- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE ..........

Uploading Date 21.1.2017 Transmission Date