Patna High CourtCR. MISC./52090/2018bail granted

Sishul Kumar @ Gulu @ Shishul Kumar @ Golu v. The State Of Bihar

2018-10-04Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.52090 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-247 Year-2018 Thana- SIWAN MUFFASIL District- Siwan ====================================================== Sishul Kumar @ Gulu @ Shishul Kumar @ Golu S/o Ramesh Tiwari @ Ramesh Towari, R/o Vill.- Baliya Pokhra Madhopur, P.S.- Maharajganj, District- Siwan.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bijay Prakash Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Binod Kumar 3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in Siwan Muffasil P.S. Case No. 247 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 399, 402, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1b)a, 26/35 of the Arms Act. Allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of two live cartridges and one mobile phone.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner is in custody since 07.05.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52090 of 2018(2) dt.04-10-2018 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate-Siwan in connection with Siwan Muffasil P.S. Case No. 247 of 2018, with following conditions:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U