Patna High CourtCR. MISC./54583/2024rejected

Ravi Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-10-18Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54583 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-200 Year-2024 Thana- SHEKHPURA District- Sheikhpura ====================================================== Ravi Ranjan Kumar Son of Arun Kumar R/O Village- Chero, P.S.- Sarmera, District- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bipin Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 18-10-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. As per allegation in the FIR, informant got a secret information that petitioner along with other co-accused were going to smuggle arms in white color Xylo car bearing registration no. BR-52A-2022. Informant along with other police personnel reached at the spot and apprehended the petitioner along with other co-accused persons with one rifle, two country made pistols and 20 pieces of live cartridges.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has committed no offence and has falsely been implicated in this case and no incriminating articles has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. He next submits

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54583 of 2024(3) dt.18-10-2024 2/2 that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He further submits that father of the petitioner has lodged an FIR for kidnapping of the petitioner by unknown miscreants vide Sarmera P.S. Case No. 89 of 2024 dated 22.04.2024. He next submits that the petitioner is in custody since 24.04.2024.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the petitioner is named in the FIR.

6. On perusal of the first information report, seizure list and impugned order dated 10.07.2024, it appears that petitioner is named in the FIR and one rifle, two country made pistol and 20 live cartridges were recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and no documents were produced regarding the recovery of the arms, so considering all aspects of the matter, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) saurabhkr/- U T