Ranjeeta Kuamri v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5712 of 2014 =========================================================== Ranjeeta Kumari, Wife of Shri Gautam Kumar Singh, Resident of VillageSinghasini, P.S. Ramgarhwa, District- East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Bihar, Patna.

2. The Collector, East Champaran, Motihari.

3. The District Programme Officer, Prarambhik Shiksha and Serva Shiksha Abhiyan, East Champaran, Motihari.

4. The District Superintendent of Education-cum-District Programme CoOrdinator, East Champaran, Motihari.

5. The Headmaster-cum-Convenor, Kasturba Gandhi Balika Vidyalya, Singhasini, Ramgarhwa, District- East Champaran

6. The District Gender Co-ordinator, Prarambhik Shiksha and Serva Shiksha Abhiyan, East Champaran At Motihari.

.... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Ajeet Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Anshul, S.C.32 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 06-05-2016 The nature of engagement of the petitioner being totally temporary and contractual, the remedy against the decision, not to engage the petitioner or continue with her hiring, cannot be subject matter of judicial review under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Petitioner may, however, seek remedy within the contract or under common law. Writ application stands disposed of.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) SanjayKumar/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 09.05.2016 Transmission Date