Patna High CourtCWJC/11335/2014disposed

Kumod Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-07-26Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11335 of 2014 ====================================================== Kumod Kumar son of Pasupati Thakur resident of Village - Mauna Mahima, Police Station + Post Office - ( Belsar ) Vaishali District - Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. District Magistrate, Vaishali

3. District Education Officer, Vaishali

4. Block Education officer, Patepur, Belsar, District Vaishali

5. Amar Nath Sharma Son of Mahendra Sharma resident of village - Panchayat Chakguladdin, P.O. Patedha Jayram, District - Vaishali ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pancham Lal, Advocate Mr. Raju Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Birju Prasad, GP-13 Mr. Amresh, AC to GP-13 Mr. Ravi Kumar, AC to GP-13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 26-07-2018 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to add the District Programme Officer (Vaishali) as party respondent No. 6 during the course of the day.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was validly appointed and he is regularly working but he is not getting salary notwithstanding the fact that the petitioner is regularly working.

3. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to examine whether

Patna High Court CWJC No.11335 of 2014 dt.26-07-2018 2/2 the petitioner was validly appointed and whether he has worked for the period he is claiming salary or not.

4. The District Programme Officer (Establishment) Vaishali is hereby directed to verify the record and if it is found that the petitioner has been validly appointed and he has worked for the period he is claiming salary, necessary decision for payment of salary will be taken by the District Programme Officer (Establishment) within a maximum period of four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

5. With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) spandey/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 27.07.2018 Transmission Date