← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./36060/2016rejected

Prakash Yadav v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2016-09-08The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.36060 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1670 Year- 2001 Thana -KATIHAR COMPLAINT CASE DistrictKATIHAR ======================================================

1. Prakash Yadav, son of Babulal Yadav, resident of village - Bharkhal, P.S. Routara, District - Katihar .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar,

2. Surti Kumari, wife of Somaru Rishi, resident of village - Bharkhal, P.S. Routara, District - Katihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Musowir, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Sri Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 2/ 08-09-2016 This is an application, made under Section 439 & 440 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking bail for the accused-petitioner, namely, Prakash Yadav, in connection with C.A. Case No.1670 of 2001, under Sections 376/34 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Katihar.

Perused the above application and materials on record.

Heard Mr. Md. Musowir, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing on behalf of the State. Having regard to the nature of incriminating

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36060 of 2016 (2) dt.08-09-2016 2/2 materials available on record coupled with the fact that the accused-petitioner absconded for a long time and his case was separated from the other co-accused, this Court is of the view that the accused-petitioner, above-named, can not be allowed to go on bail.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the prayer for bail is hereby rejected.

While rejecting the prayer for bail, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Katihar, is hereby directed to expedite the commitment of C.A. Case No.1670 of 2001, and, thereafter, the trial Court shall try to dispose of the case expeditiously. (I.A. Ansari,CJ) JA/- U T