Pramod Yadav And ORS. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28441 of 2016 (2) dt.14-07-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.28441 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -48 Year- 2016 Thana -GURUA District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Pramod Yadav son of Sita Yadav, Resident of village- Nadiyama, P.S. Gurua, District- Gaya.

2. Bartu Yadav, son of Manhagu Yadav, Resident of village- Gulni, P.S. Gurua, District- Gaya.

3. Sanoj Yadav Son of Moti Yadav, Resident of Village-Katayeeya, P.S.- Jori, District- Chatra.

4. Ranjit Yadav, @ Ranjit Kumar Son of Sita Yadav, Resident of VillageAanjan, P.S- Raushanganj, District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 14-07-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 342, 323, 325, 307, 353, 379, 332, 333,504,506 and 283 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering the period of custody and fair antecedent of the petitioners, let them be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/-(Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the Court below to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati at Gaya in connection with Gurua P.S. Case No. 48 of 2016 subject to the conditions, (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28441 of 2016 (2) dt.14-07-2016 the petitioners, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners.

The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioners, (ii) that the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not accused in any other case and, if they are, they shall not be released on bail, (iii) that the bailors shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse,(iv) that the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, and (v) that the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled.

(Anjana Prakash, J) Prakash/- U T