← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/4363/2014disposed

Shanti Devi Jha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-11-17Mr. Justice Ashwani Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4363 of 2014 =========================================================== Shanti Devi Jha, wife of late Lalit Narayan Jha, resident of near Women College, Sipahi Tola, Purnea, P.S. Khazanchi Hatt, District - Purnea, the retired reader, Department of Political Science, Women's College, Purnea .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

3. The Director, Higher Education, Government of Bihar, Patna

4. Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University, Madhepura through the Vice Chancellor

5. The Vice - Chancellor, Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University, Madhepura

6. The Registrar, Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University, Madhepura

7. The Finance Officer, Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University, Madhepura

8. The Principal, Women's College, Purnea .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Vijay Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Tej Bahadur Singh, A.A.G. - 7 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 17-11-2016 At the outset, it is conceded by the learned counsel for the petitioner that during pendency of the present writ petition, the petitioner has been paid his post retirement benefits under the Heads Gratuity, Leave Enchashment, Group Insurance, General Provident Fund and arrears of Pension. However, it is contended that there appears to be some miscalculation in the computation made by the respondent authorities.

In view of the fact that the admitted dues of the petitioner has already been paid, this application is disposed of with

Patna High Court CWJC No.4363 of 2014 dt.17-11-2016 2/2 liberty to the petitioner to raise her grievance relating to any error in calculation before the Respondent No. 6 within four weeks from today. In case, such a representation is filed, the Respondent No. 6 is directed to look into the matter and dispose of the same within a period of two months thereafter by a reasoned order. (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) S.Ali/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A.

Uploading Date 19/11/2016 Transmission Date