Guddu Yadav @ Sanjeev Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 28375 of 2016 Arising out of P.S. Case No. -198 Year- 2011 Thana - BHAGALPUR KOTWALI District- BHAGALPUR =================================================== Guddu Yadav @ Sanjeev Yadav Son of Naresh Yadav resident of Village- Bari Khanjarpur, P.S. Barari, District Bhagalpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s =================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. APP.

=================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 02.

14.07.2016 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State.

The Petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 457, 380 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code.

Considering that the recovery was not made from the possession of the Petitioner and he has fair antecedents, let him be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur in connection with Kotwali (Adampur) P.S. Case No. 198 of 2011 (G.R. No 861 of 2011) subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioner who will give an affidavit

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28375 of 2016 (2) dt.14-07-2016 giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the Petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse.

(iv) That the Petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the Petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.) U T