← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/18157/2017disposed

Md. Emad Uddin v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-05-14Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18157 of 2017 ====================================================== Md. Emad Uddin, Son of Md. Yaquin Uddin, resident of VillageMobarakpur, Police Station- Salkhua, District- Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director, Primary Education Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Magistrate, Madhepura.

4. The District Education Officer, Madhepura.

5. The District Porgramme Officer, Madhepura.

6. The Block Development Officer, Chousa, District- Madhepura.

7. The Block Education Officer, Chousa, District- Madhepura.

8. The Panchayat Teachers Employment Unit, Rasalpur Dhuria, PrakhandChousa, through Panchayat Secretary of Gram Panchayat, Rasalpur Dhuria, District- Madhepura.

9. Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat, Rasalpur Dhuria, Prakhand-Chousa, District- Madhepura.

10. The District Appellate Authority, Madhepura through its Member (Presiding Officer).

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranjit Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Smt.Shilpa Singh -GA-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 14-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

In view of the fact that the State Appellate Authority is now functional, the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition in order to file an appeal before the State Appellate Authority.

Permission is granted.

In case the petitioner files an appeal before the State

Patna High Court CWJC No.18157 of 2017(3) dt.14-05-2018 2/2 Appellate Authority within a period of one month from today along with a copy of this order, the State Appellate Authority is required to decide the appeal on its own merit after condoning the delay in filing the appeal in view of the fact that the petitioner was pursuing the writ petition for the same relief before this Court.

With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U