Patna High CourtCWJC/4357/2014disposed

Umesh Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-04-07Mr. Justice Mihir Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4357 of 2014 ====================================================== Umesh Prasad Singh Son Of Late Ram Chandra Prasad Singh Resident Of Bhagat Tola Marachi, P.S. Hathidah, District - Patna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through Chief Secretary Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

2. The Secretary, Energy Department Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

3. The Cmd Bihar State Power Holding Company Limited Vidyut Bhawan Bailey Road, Patna

4. The Md North Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited Vidyut Bhawan Bailey Road, Patna

5. The Dgm ( Hr And Adm. ) Bihar State Power Holding Company Limited Vidyut Bhawan Bailey Road, Patna

6. The Gm ( Hr And Adm. ) North Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited Patna

7. The Electrical Superintending Engineer, Electric Supply Circle, Darbhanga District - Darbhanga

8. The Electrical Executive Engineer, Electric Supply Division Darbhanga ( Rural ) District Darbhanga

9. The Accounts Officer Electric Supply Circle Darbhanga, District - Darbhanga

10. The Sr. Manager ( Personnel ) Mithila Electric Supply Area Darbhanga District Darbhanga .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ganjendra Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Shiv Kumar, AC to GA-7 For the Electricity Board : Ms. Archana Sinha, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MIHIR KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 07-04-2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Having regard to the fact that subsequent to the filing of this writ application on 25.2.2014, the respondents have made payment of the group insurance, leave encashment and G.P.F. by cheques dated 16.10.2014 and 14.11.2014, this writ application definitely has now become infructuous specially when this Court

Patna High Court CWJC No.4357 of 2014 (2) dt.07-04-2015 would find that even the amount of 100% pension and 90% gratuity has already been sanctioned. Nonetheless, the petitioner's payment of pension and gratuity, which have already been sanctioned, if not already made, must be made to the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

With the aforementioned observation and direction this application is disposed of.

(Mihir Kumar Jha, J) Rishi/- U