Rabiya Praween v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52368 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-110 Year-2022 Thana- ISHAKCHAK District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== RABIYA PRAWEEN WIFE OF JABAZULLAH ANSARI R/O MOHALLAJAMABASK LANE GOAL TOLA BHIKHANPUR, P.S.- ISHAK CHAK, DISTRICT- BHAGALPUR ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Dr. Manoj Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Bharat Bhushan, APP.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 12-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects within four weeks.
Petitioner apprehends her arrest in a case registered for offence punishable u/s 376, 385, 506, 509, 120B/34 of the IPC. Allegedly, the petitioner abused and threatened the informant. She made a post of wrong words on Facebook against the informant.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. She has been falsely implicated in this case merely on the basis that she is the wife of the co-accused Jabazullah Ansari. It is further
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52368 of 2022(2) dt.12-12-2022 2/2 stated that there is no allegation of demand of money from the informant at any point against the petitioner. No occurrence took place as alleged in the FIR. The place of occurrence and manner of occurrence are imaginary. The whole prosecution is false, concocted and far from the truth. The real fact is that the informant has viraled her photograph with another person on Facebook, thereafter the informant has included some word only in her Facebook post. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since there is specific allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge her on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on her behalf is hereby rejected. This application is accordingly dismissed.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T