Patna High CourtC. REV./326/2017dismissed

Ramesh Chandra Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar And ANR

2018-09-26Mr. Justice Hemant Kumar Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Review No.326 of 2017 In C.R. 168 of 2014 ====================================================== Ramesh Chandra Choudhary, Son of Late Deo Charan Choudhary, Resident of Punaichak, P.S.- Lal Bahadur Shastri Nagar, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through, the Secretary Building Construction Department, 'Vishweshwarraiya Bhawan', Bailey Road, Patna.

2. The Executive Engineer, Building Construction Department, Central Division, Near High Court, Patna.

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Shekhar For the Respondent/s : Mr. R. B. Pd. Yadav ( AAG- XI ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 26-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the applicant and perused the record.

The applicant has preferred this review petition in connection with order dated 27.04.2017 passed in Civil Revision No. 168 of 2014.

Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the petitioner had filed Reference Case No. 122 of 2010 in Bihar Public Works Contracts Disputes Arbitration Tribunal, Patna but the claim of the petitioner was dismissed by the Tribunal holding that his claim was time barred and against the aforesaid order, the applicant filed Civil Revision No. 168 of

Patna High Court C. REV. No.326 of 2017 (7) dt.26-09-2018 2/2 2014 but the aforesaid civil revision was, too, dismissed by this court. However, at the time of passing order dated 27.04.2017 in Civil Revision No. 168 of 2014, this court over-looked that final bill in respect of claim of the petitioner had not been prepared by the department as yet.

I do not find any substance in the submission of learned counsel of applicant and in my view, this review petition is liable to be dismissed on admission stage itself as there is no apparent error on the face of impugned order dated 27.04.2017. Accordingly, this review petition stands dismissed on admission stage itself.

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) SHAHZAD/-Rajeev U