Kailash Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54370 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-223 Year-2022 Thana- MANPUR District- Nalanda ====================================================== KAILASH MANJHI Son of Suraj Manjhi Resident of Village-Hargawan, P.S.-Manpur, District-Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shailesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Parmanand Kumar Mr. Nitya Nand Neeraj Ms. Kumari Anupam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 31-08-2023 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Manpur P.S. Case No.223 of 2022, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 307, 379 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The allegation against the petitioner is that he along with other co-accused persons assaulted the informant's side by means of several weapons due to which they sustained injuries.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and have committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is no specific overt act against the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54370 of 2023(2) dt.31-08-2023 2/2 petitioner. Petitioner has one criminal antecedent.
5. Learned APP for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail by submitting that there is a specific allegation against the petitioner to assault the informant by means of iron rod due to which he sustained grievous injuries.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case as well as considering the nature of injury, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on his behalf is hereby rejected.
7. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.
8. However, if the petitioner surrenders before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today and seek for regular bail, the learned Court below shall pass the order on the same day, in accordance with law.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T