Vijay Kumar Mishra v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3279 of 2017 In Letters Patent Appeal No.631 of 2016 ====================================================== Vijay Kumar Mishra, son of Late Ashok Kumar Mishra, resident of Village and P.O.- Hitalpur, P.S. Hajipur, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Mr. Pratyay Amrit, I.A.S., The Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar, patna

3. Mr. V. Ram, The Engineer-in-Chief-cum-Special Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

4. Mr. Ram Awadhesh Ram, The Chief Engineer, National Highway, Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

5. Mr. Krishna Murari Yadav, Superintending Engineer, National Highway Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

6. Mr. Ahmad Hussain, The Executive Engineer, National Highway Division, Gulzarbagh, Patna

7. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Agrawal, The District Level Compassionate Committee, Patna through its Chairman-cum-District Magistrate, Patna

8. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Agrawal, The District Magistrate, Patna, District- Patna

9. Mr. Manoj Kumar, The Deputy Collector, Establishment, Patna Collectorate, Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shanti Pratap, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Raj Ballabh Pd. Yadav - AAG- 11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 02-08-2018 Keeping in view the fact that after orders passed in the L.P.A., the matter was referred to the District Appointment Committee and now for various reasons, as are indicated in the proceedings of the District Appointment Committee, as is available on record dated 03.02.2018, claim of the petitioner has

Patna High Court MJC No.3279 of 2017(3) dt.02-08-2018 2/2 been rejected for various reasons, as are indicated therein, in this contempt proceedings no further indulgence is called for. In case the petitioner has any grievance with regard to the manner in which the District Appointment Committee has considered the claim for compassionate appointment and rejected the same, the petitioner will have liberty to challenge it in accordance with law.

With the aforesaid, the contempt application stands disposed of.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) P.K.P./- U