← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/7223/2017disposed

Dr. Nand Kumar Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-04-25Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7223 of 2017 =========================================================== Dr. Nand Kumar Prasad Son of Late Ram Krishna Sinha residing at Flat No. 303, Maa Shitla Complex, Agam Kuan Dhanuki, Police Station- AgamKuan, DistrictPatna. Pin Code- 800007. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur through its Registrar.

4. Registrar, B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur.

5. Finance Officer, B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur.

6. Principal Sri Narayan Singh, College, Motihari, District East Champaran, Pin Code- 845401.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gyanand Roy, Advocate For the University :

Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Mr. Vikas Ratan Bharti and Mr. Rohit Raj, Advocates For the State :

Mr. Prabhakar Jha, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 25-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; State and B.R.A. Bihar University (hereinafter referred to as the 'University').

2. From the pleadings on record, it appears that the admitted dues of the petitioner have been paid. However, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in another writ, during the pendency of the present writ, he has been allowed promotion by the Court, which has also been implemented by the University and, thus, now payments have to be made in the revised scale in terms of such promotion.

Patna High Court CWJC No.7223 of 2017 dt.25-04-2018 2/2

3. Be that as it may, since the same is a fresh cause of action and that too for an event which has taken place subsequent to the filing of the writ application, the Court would only observe that in terms of the promotion granted, it is for the University to pass consequential orders and make payments, as may be required in law.

4. The writ petition stands disposed off.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar AFR/NAFR U