Shamshad Alam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.58959 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-96 Year-2018 Thana- SANHAULA District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Shamshad Alam Son of Rashid Alam, resident of Village- Palwa, P.S.- Sanhaula, District- Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vivekanand Vivek For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Parmeshwar Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 10-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Sanhaula P.S. Case No. 96 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 20/22 of N.D.P.S. Act. Allegation against petitioner is of recovery of 202 gram Ganja from the shop of the petitioner.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 29.05.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.58959 of 2018(2) dt.10-10-2018 2/2 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Bhagalpur, in connection with Sanhaula P.S. Case No. 96 of 2018, subject to further condition:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T