Surajbhan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.56052 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -756 Year- 2017 Thana -JAHANABAD District- JEHANABAD ======================================================

1. Surajbhan Singh, S/o Madhurendra Kumar Singh, Resident of MohallaTaraiya Dumri, P.S. Taraiya, District- Chapra (Saran). .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha, Adocate For the Opposite Party/s : Smt Pushpa Sinha, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 08-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Jehanabad (Karauna O.P.)P. S. Case No. 756 of 2017 registered for offences punishable under Sections 399, 402 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25 (1-b) (a), 26/35 of the Arms Act.. Allegation as per F.I.R. against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with unknown persons were planning of dacoity and after seeing the police personalm, they tried to flee away from there and after chase five peoples were apprehended whereas two persons got succeeded in fleeing away and one country made pistol, two live cartridges, two mobiles and debit card have been recovered from the possession of apprehended

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.56052 of 2018 (2) dt.08-10-2018 2/2 persons and accordingly, seizure list has been prepared. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the case and the petitioner is in custody since 06.11.2017. It is also submitted that the charge sheet has also been submitted against the petitioner. Heard learned A.P.P., who opposes the prayer for bail.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant privilege of bail to the petitioner with a further direction to the lower court to expedite the trial and conclude the same within a period of three months from the receipt/ production of a copy of this order of this court, if not concluded, the petitioner shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of trial Court.

With the aforesaid observation, the instant petition is disposed of.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T