Manoj Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.33740 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -69 Year- 2015 Thana -BAHADURPUR District- DARBHANGA ====================================================== Manoj Sahni, Son of Ram Lakhan Sahni, Resident of Village- Rahhamganj, P.S. Laheriasarai, District-Darbhanga.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amit Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Satyendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 17-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is accused in connection with Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 69 of 2015, registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 325, 307 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer of the petitioner was earlier rejected on 04.03.2016 taking into consideration the allegation that this petitioner along with four others named in the F.I.R. and six unknown caught the husband of the informant and caused assault to him, who died subsequently. Further submission is that after investigation, Chargesheet has already been submitted against the petitioner. Further submission is that similarly situated co-accused, Bishnu

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33740 of 2016 (2) dt.17-08-2016 2/2 Sahni @ Bishun Sahni has already been granted privilege of bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 29.06.2016 passed in Criminal Misc. No. 17784 of 2016. The petitioner is in custody since 17.03.2015.

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the 2nd Addl. Sessions Judge, Darbhanga in connection with Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 69 of 2015 (S.T. No. 316 of 2015). Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit showing his relation with the petitioner and further the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of the trial in the court below. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates during the course of the trial without any reasonable cause being shown, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J.) manish/- U T