Kameshwar Kumar @ Kameshwar Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51871 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-219 Year-2021 Thana- SANGRAMPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== KAMESHWAR KUMAR @ KAMESHWAR TIWARI Son of Dhanusdhari Tiwari Resident of Village-Sikanderpur, P.S.-Sangrampur, District-East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Vijay Shankar Shrivastava, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms.Nirmala Kumari, APP.
Mr. Diwakar Prasad Singh, Adv.
Mr. Kundan Rathore, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 02-11-2023 Heard learned counsels for the parties.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 468, 471, 420 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The allegation against the petitioner is that he did not hand over his charge and put forged signature of the informant on a school letter pad and obtained NOC.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is totally false and based on concocted facts. There is no evidence in the entire
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51871 of 2023(4) dt.02-11-2023 2/2 case diary against the petitioner that he has made forged signature of the informant. Although, the present case is of the year 2021, but the investigation is still going on and for verification of the forged signature of the informant, it has not yet been sent to FSL. Petitioner has three criminal antecedents as mentioned in para-3 of this application.
5. Learned APP for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for bail.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments of the parties, the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Sangrampur P.S. Case No. 219 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
7. Petitioner is directed to co-operate in the trial. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T