Patna High CourtCWJC/3716/2014dismissed

Upendra Narayan v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-01-30Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3716 of 2014 ===========================================================

1. Upendra Narayan Son Of Late Sri Govind Prasad Resident Of VillageDariyapur, P.O. Barhog, P.S. Bind, District- Nalanda. At Present Yasoda Bhawan C/O Sri Devendra Chaudhary, Guru Sahai Lodge, Nala Road, Patna 4, DistrictPatna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. The Director, Primary Education Department, Govt. Of Bihar Patna

3. The Deputy Development Commissioner Cum Chairman District Education Establishment Committee, Biharsharif, District- Nalanda

4. The District Superintendent Of Education Nalanda, District- Nalanda

5. The District Education Officer, Nalanda At Biharsharif

6. The District Programme Officer (Establishment) Nalanda At Bihar Sharif

7. The Block Education Extension Officer, Biharsharif- 2, District- Nalanda

8. The Treasury Officer, Biharsharif, Nalanda .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Nandan Prasad For the Respondent/s : Mr. Manoj Kr. Ambastha =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 30-01-2016 It is an ill advised writ application filed on behalf of the petitioner a second time over. It is nothing but taking a chance or if not gambling with the system.

He is looking for pension, gratuity etc. which cannot be made available to him for the reason that the petitioner resigned from service and his resignation was accepted way back on 18th of August, 2003.

This position also stands certified from Annexure-B, which is the order passed in the earlier writ application of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CWJC No.3716 of 2014 dt.30-01-2016 2/2 Counter affidavit indicating that position has been filed by the State and is placed on record.

The Court was inclined to impose heavy cost upon the petitioner for wasting valuable judicial time and burdening the system. However, on earnest prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner, he is let off with caution and warning. Writ application stands disposed off.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) SKM/- U