The State Of Bihar v. Baidyanath Jha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL REVIEW No.151 of 2021 In Letters Patent Appeal No.43 of 2016 ====================================================== 1.

The State of Bihar Through its Chief Secretary, Patna. 2.

The Secretary, Department of Human Resources, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 4.

The Department of Finance, Government of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Patna.

5.

The Special Director, Secondary Education (In - Charge Sanskrit), Education Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Baidyanath Jha Son of Late Nirash Jha Resident of village Baurha, P.O. and P.S. Laukaha, District - Madhubani, Secretary of Non - Government Recognized and Aided Sanskrit Primary, Middle and High School Teachers Association of the District of Madhubani.

2.

The Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board Through its Secretary, Near Chitkohara Bridge, Patna off Harding Road, Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. P. K. Shahi, AG Mr. Parijat Saurav (AC To AAG-10) For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Abhinav Raj, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 15-05-2023 Defects with respect to synopsis and limitation petition is cured. Hence, the other defects are overruled. A review application has been filed after the SLP was dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the SLP is produced as Annexure-1.

Patna High Court C. REV. No.151 of 2021(3) dt.15-05-2023 2/2 The Hon'ble Supreme Court has found the Special Leave Petition to be inordinately delayed and, hence, dismissed the SLP. In the circumstances of the SLP itself having been found to be inordinately delayed, the review petition filed after the SLP was dismissed for delay cannot be entertained; since it is also delayed.

With the above observations, the review application is dismissed.

Interlocutory application, if any, shall stand closed. (K. Vinod Chandran, CJ) ( Partha Sarthy, J) sharun/- U