Dilip Kumar Chaudhary @ Dilip Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8593 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-42 Year-2020 Thana- PARSAUNI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Dilip Kumar Chaudhary @ Dilip Chaudhary Son Of Jhojhan Chaudhary Resident of Mohalla- Parsauni Mailwar, ward no-9, P.S. Parsauni, DistrictSitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranjeet Kumar Mishra, Adv.

For the State :

Dr. Mriyunjay Kr. Gutam, APP For the Informant Ms. Rina Kumari, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 13-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections363/366A of the Indian Penal Code.

Daughter of the informant has been kidnapped by the petitioner along with other co-accused.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that in her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. the victim has accepted that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8593 of 2021(2) dt.13-12-2021 2/2 she had love affair with Sunil Kumar and she wants to marry with him. He submits that there is compromise between the parties and victim's marriage has already been solemnized with another person. He submits that occurrence took place on 16.06.2020 but FIR was lodged on 21.06.2020 after delay of five days. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the informant and State oppose the prayer for bail and submit that compromise has been done between the parties.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submission of the informant, the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Parsauni P.S. Case No. 42 of 2020, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T