Raju Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.53902 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-178 Year-2017 Thana- ISHAKCHAK District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Raju Kumar, Son of Mahesh Ram, Resident of Mohalla Laluchak (Ishakchak), P.S. Ishakchak, District- Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Dr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 19-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Ishak Chak P.S. Case No.178 of 2017 registered under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. as on the basis of the fardbeyan of the informant Ajeet Kumar Datta, the present case was instituted against unknown on 23.12.2017. In course of investigation, the police got recorded the confessional statement of the co-accused Kishan Kumar alias Chhotu, who disclosed the name of the petitioner as his associate, indulged in the alleged offence of robbery. It is further submitted that the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.53902 of 2018(2) dt.19-09-2018 2/2 petitioner is in custody since 28.06.2018 but he has not been put on T.I. Parade, while the informant has claimed to identify the culprits on seeing them again. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur, in connection with Ishakchak P.S. Case No.178 of 2017. Out of the two sureties, one must be close relative of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he/she is related with the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) P.S./- U T