Santosh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50766 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-81 Year-2019 Thana- BARUN District- Aurangabad ====================================================== SANTOSH KUMAR Son of Keshnath Singh Resident of Village - Bhadokhra, P.S.- Dehri On Sone, District- Rohtas at Sasaram ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Dewendra Narayan Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms.Dr. Indiwar Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 17-08-2019 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Barun Police Station Case No. 81 of 2019, disclosing offences under Sections 379/411/420/34 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 4/40 of the Bihar Minor Mineral Concession Rules and Section 15 of the Environment Protection Act. The allegation against the petitioner, as per the First Information Report, is that a Mahindra tractor, B-275 D1, having Engine No. RAFL00378, along with trailor, was seized by the police along with some other vehicles and the vehicle was found engaged in transportation of illegal sand, which was standing near the road. It has further been alleged that sand was mined illegally and transportation was being done through the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50766 of 2019(3) dt.17-08-2019 2/3 vehicles.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the police has seized some other vehicles along with the vehicle of the petitioner and the petitioner is the driver of the seized tractor, in question. He further submits that sand, which was allegedly found was mined illegally, but was mixed with earth and it was not pure sand, as alleged. He further relied on Annexure-2, which are orders passed by this Court granting bail to the owner and driver of the other vehicles, which were seized in the same transaction, by orders dated 09.05.2019 and 28.05.2019, passed in Criminal Misc. Nos. 30895 and 34600 of 2019.
After having heard learned Counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the fact that similarly situated coaccused persons have been granted bail by this Court, I am inclined to grant the petitioner privilege of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, this application is allowed.
Let the petitioner, Santosh Kumar in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within four weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, in
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50766 of 2019(3) dt.17-08-2019 3/3 connection with Barun Police Station Case No. 81 of 2019, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
This is subject to the condition that the petitioner shall present himself before the police/Court, as the case may be, as and when required and in the event of failure on his part to appear before the Court on two consecutive occasions, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled.
(Anil Kumar Sinha, J.) Prabhakar Anand/- U √ T √