Md. Laddan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9378 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-150 Year-2020 Thana- KAMTAUL District- Darbhanga ====================================================== MD. LADDAN, age 27, Male, Son of Md. Shaukat, Resident of VillageTrimuhan, P.S.- Kamtaul, District- Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Sada Nand Roy, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Mohammad Arif, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-02-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Kamtaul P.S. Case No. 150 of 2020 for the offence registered under Sections 341, 342, 307 and 504 of the I.P.C.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that the informant was married with the petitioner and the petitioner kept her in Delhi and village also. The behaviour of the petitioner was not good as he has illicit relation with another girl. On objection, the petitioner used to beat her due to which she came to her Naihar.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9378 of 2021(2) dt.28-02-2022 2/3 On 24.06.2020 at about 10.30 A.M., her husband came in her room and played music on high volume. The petitioner tied her legs and hands and closed the room. He tried to slit her neck with Ustura (shaving knife) with intention to kill her. Due to which, she became unconscious. He caused multiple injury on her neck. In the meantime, the brother and sister of the informant came there. They saved her and brought her D.M.C.H. for treatment.

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Nature of injury is said to be simple. No offence under Section 307 of the I.P.C. is made out in the present case. At best, it is a case for the offence under Section 324 of the I.P.C.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9378 of 2021(2) dt.28-02-2022 3/3 furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Darbhanga, in connection with Kamtaul P.S. Case No. 150 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J) U.K./- U T