Junaid Alam v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52297 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-307 Year-2025 Thana- SARAIYA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Junaid Alam S/o Md. Kalam R/o vill - Mungauli, P.S.- Saraiya, Distt.- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Priyesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Pushpa Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 12-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Saraiya P.S. Case No. 307 of 2025, dated 16.06.2025, lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.
3. As per the prosecution, total recovery of 180 litres of illicit liquor has been made, which is the subject matter of the present case.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He further submits that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. He further submits that the petitioner is neither the owner nor the driver of the said vehicle. He also submits that the petiitoner's name was disclosed by the apprehended accused person. Furthermore, he submits that the criminal antecedent of the petitioner is clean.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52297 of 2025(2) dt.12-08-2025 2/2
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. As such, in the present facts and circumstances of this case, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Trial Court within a period of 4 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) as mentioned in Section 2(1)(d) of the BNSS, 2023 to the satisfaction of Exclusive Special Judge Excise-II, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Saraiya P.S. Case No. 307 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down U/s 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023.
7. It is further directed that the Trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner, and in case it is found at any stage that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the Trial Court shall take steps for cancellation of the petitioner's bail bond. However, the acceptance of the bail bond in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for the purpose of or in the name of verification. (Dr. Anshuman, J.) Aman Kumar/- U T