Hare Ram Bind @ Harun @ Hare Ram Singh Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.26523 of 2016 Arising Out of P.S. Case No.111 Year- 2016 Thana -MARHAURA District- SARAN ====================================================== Hare Ram Bind @ Harun @ Hare Ram Singh Mahto, s/o Mukhlal Mahto, resident of village- Asahiya, P.S. Marhowrah, Distt.- Saran at Chapra. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar, Adv. For the State : Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 12-07-2016 Heard learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the State. The Petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 414, 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering the fair antecedent of the Petitioner and the fact that his name was disclosed in the statement of the coaccused who was caught with stolen vehicle and his elder brother Uday Mahto undertakes his responsibility, let him be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate -II, Saran at Chapra in connection with Marhowrah P.S. Case No. 111 of 2016, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioner who will

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26523 of 2016 (2) dt.12-07-2016 2/2 give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioner and the other shall be the elder brother of the Petitioner namely, Uday Mahto. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the Petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is, he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse.

(iv) That the Petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the Petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

(Anjana Prakash, J) S.Ali/- U T