Sandeep Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62249 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-133 Year-2021 Thana- BHABHU(KAIMUR) COMPLAIN C District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== 1.

SANDEEP SINGH SON OF SATYENDRA SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AJGARA, P.S.- KUDRA, DISTRICT- KAIMUR (BHABHUA) 2.

DILIP SINGH SON OF SATYENDRA SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGEAJGARA, P.S.- KUDRA, DISTRICT- KAIMUR (BHABHUA) 3.

KULDEEP SINGH SON OF SATYENDRA SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- AJGARA, P.S.- KUDRA, DISTRICT- KAIMUR (BHABHUA) 4.

SATYENDRA SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- AJGARA, P.S.- KUDRA, DISTRICT- KAIMUR (BHABHUA) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.

ARTI DEVI WIFE OF SANDEEP SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGEAJGARA, P.S.- KUDRA, DISTRICT- KAIMUR (BHABHUA) ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar Singh No.10 For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Indu Kumari Srivastava ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 12-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is expected to honour his undertaking to remove the defects as pointed out by the office when called upon to do so by the office. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 133 of 2021 instituted for the offence

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62249 of 2021(3) dt.12-07-2022 2/3 under Sections 323, 341, 498A, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of the DP Act.

This case relates to torture and harassment due to nonfulfillment of motorcycle as further dowry demand and finally husband of the complainant and his family members ousted her from matrimonial home with a threatening of dire consequences.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioner no. 1 is husband and petitioner nos. 2 and 3 are her dever and petitioner no. 4 is father-in-law of the complainant and have been falsely implicated in this case. They have never demanded any thing from the complainant. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioner no. 1 is ready to keep his wife with full honour and dignity.

Learned counsel for the informant has asserted that complainant is also ready to live with her husband. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the submission made on behalf of the petitioners, this Court is inclined to enlarge them on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62249 of 2021(3) dt.12-07-2022 3/3 connection with Complaint Case No. 133 of 2021 they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Bhabhua Kaimur subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) sushma/- U