Raj Kumar Mahton v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.23403 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1091 Year- 2014 Thana -VAISALI COMPLAINT CASE DistrictVAISHALI (HAJIPUR) ====================================================== Raj Kumar Mahton S/o Ram Nath Mahton @ Vishal Mahto resident of village - Darihara, P.S. Sonepur, District - Saran .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Indu Devi W/o Raj Kumar Mahton, D/o Bindeshwar Patel resident of Arara, P.O. Diarhara, P.S. Hajipur Sadar, District - Vaishali .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Tilak Sao For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 08-07-2015 Heard both sides.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the D.P. Act.

The petitioner is husband and is ready to keep his wife. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that the complainant is also ready to live with the petitioner and resolve the dispute provided the petitioner gives undertaking to keep her safely.

Considering the willingness of the petitioner to keep his wife, the above named petitioner is directed to surrender in the court below within four weeks from today and the court below shall, after issuing notice to the complainant, grant provisional bail

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23403 of 2015 (2) dt.08-07-2015 2/2 to the petitioner on furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Vaishali at Hajipur in Complaint Case No. 1091/14.

The court below shall make all efforts for reconciliation of the dispute between the husband and the wife. If the dispute is resolved amicably between the parties, the provisional bail granted to the petitioner shall be confirmed. In case the dispute is not resolved, the court below shall pass orders on the prayer for provisional bail of the petitioner on its own merit in accordance with law.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) Dilip/- U T