Imaran Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.55981 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-134 Year-2018 Thana- THAWE District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Imaran Ansari S/o Mansur @ Mansur Ansari, R/o Vill.- Tareya Laxmi Rai, P.S.- Tareya Sujan , District- Kushinagar (Uttar Pradesh). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Umesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bisheshwar Ram, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 06-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for offence punishable under Sections 30(a), 35 and 38 of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2016.

It is contended that, as per allegation, 172.800 liters of foreign liquor was recovered from the vehicle which was being boarded by the petitioner. It is contended that the petitioner is not the driver and owner of the seized vehicle and he has no concerned at all with the seized vehicle. It is urged that the petitioner is in custody since 19.07.2018. It is stated in paragraph 3 of the bail petition that the petitioner is also involved in a similar nature of case.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55981 of 2018(2) dt.06-10-2018 2/2 Additional District and Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge Excise, Gopalganj in connection with Thawe P.S. Case No. 134/18, Gr. No. 3258/18 with a condition that if the petitioner, after his release in this case, is again found involved in similar nature of cases then the concerned court would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.

Further with a condition that one of the bailors must be belonging to the State of Bihar.

That apart, in view of the antecedents of the petitioner, he would be required to appear before the Superintendent of Police, Gopalganj within fifteen days of his release with a copy of this order and every month thereafter for the next six months. The conduct of the petitioner will be kept under watch in the aforesaid period by the Superintendent of Police concerned and if it is found wanting in any respect, a report shall be made to the court concerned by him to initiate a proceeding for cancellation of bail for reasons of misuse of bail. After reporting to the Superintendent of Police, a certificate will be filed by the petitioner before the court concerned which should be granted by the Superintendent of Police concerned upon his appearance.

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) V.K.Pandey/- U T