Rajneet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49028 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-212 Year-2019 Thana- LAHERIMUHALLA District- Nalanda ====================================================== Rajneet Kumar Son of Dinesh Prasad Resident of Village - Barnama, P.S.- Warsaliganj, District- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Samir Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Bal Mukund Prasad Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 27-09-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 392/120B of the Indian Penal Code.

Informant has alleged that while he was going to deposit Rs. 8300/- in the bank, three miscreants on motorcycle came and snatched away his money at the strength of arms and among them he could recognize Suraj Kumar. Allegation against petitioner is that he hatched the conspiracy. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been made accused only on the basis of suspicion and except suspicion there is no any other incriminating material against him. Chargesheet has already been submitted in this case. Petitioner has got no criminal

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49028 of 2019(3) dt.27-09-2019 2/2 antecedent and is in custody since 29.05.2019. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Laheri P.S. Case No. 212 of 2019, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U