Rajbanshi Rai @ Rajbanshi Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51189 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-18 Year-2024 Thana- CHIRAIYA District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Rajbanshi Rai @ Rajbanshi Yadav son of Yogindra Rai @ Yogender Ray Village- Baswariya Ps -Chiraiya District -East Champaran 2.

Sanjay Rai Son of Late Bhola Rai Village- Baswariya Ps -Chiraiya District -East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar No.III, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Parmanand Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 25-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Chiraiya P.S. Case No. 18 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 307, 324, 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Prosecution story, in short, is that the accused persons assaulted the informant and his nephew with deadly weapons over a sewerage dispute due to which they sustained injuries. It is also alleged that during the assault, a gold chain was also snatched.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51189 of 2025(2) dt.25-07-2025 2/2 petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that general and omnibus allegation has been made against these petitioners. No specific overt act is alleged against these petitioners. As per the injury report, one injury is simple in nature and one injury is grievous in nature. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioner no. 1 has one criminal antecedent whereas petitioner no. 2 has one criminal antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, there being no direct allegation against the petitioners as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

7. Let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Chiraiya P.S. Case No. 18 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T