← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48479/2019allowed

Dharmendra Kumar Yadav @ Dharmendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2019-11-27Mr. Justice Arvind Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48479 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-116 Year-2016 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Araria ====================================================== DHARMENDRA KUMAR YADAV @ DHARMENDRA YADAV Son of Late Darbari Yadav Resident of Village - Hasanpur, Ward No. 03, P.S.- Raniganj, Distt - Araria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ramesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nand Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 27-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Araria (Mahila) P.S. Case No. 116 of 2016 registered under Sections 354B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 7/8 of the POCSO Act.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner is a lawyer, who is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the case. The F.I.R. is lodged after lapse of three days of the alleged occurrence. A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner stating that prior to the present case, one case i.e. Araria (SC/ST) P.S. Case No. 63 of 2016 was lodged against the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48479 of 2019(4) dt.27-11-2019 2/2 father of the present informant by one Chaniya Devi. Thereafter, the accused of that case kidnapped the informant Chaniya Devi, for which one another case was also lodged by Taramani Devi, daughter of the informant of Araria (SC/ST) P.S. Case No. 63 of 2016. The petitioner was engaged as a lawyer by the informant of both the cases. Thereafter, in retaliation to those cases, at the instigation of father of the present informant, this case has been filed dragging the petitioner in the present case falsely with a view to teach him a lesson.

Having considered the above facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Araria in connection with Araria (Mahila) P.S. Case No. 116 of 2016, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C.

(Arvind Srivastava, J) shailendra/- U T