Amarjeet Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.32673 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -9 Year- 2014 Thana -AGIAUN District- BHOJPUR ====================================================== Amarjeet Yadav son of Rajeshwar Yadav Resident of Village - Pipra, P.S. - Agiaon (Garhani), District - Bhojpur at Ara (Bihar). .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri S.M. Rahman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 15-12-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offences punishable under sections 302, 201 and 34 of the I.P.C This case has been registered on the basis of the Complaint Case No. 2317 © of 2013 with allegation that the petitioner being husband along with other co-accused killed Maya Devi, the daughter of the complainant, who was married on 20.05.1999. The petitioner was having illicit relationship with Kiran Devi, another daughter of the complainant and they all have killed Maya Devi after administering poison and burnt the dead body also.

Submission is of false implication and that during

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32673 of 2016 (3) dt.15-12-2016 2/2 investigation the witnesses Madan Yadav, Prabhans Singh and Rishikesh Kumar vide paragraphs- 6, 30 and 31 of the case diary have stated that Maya Devi committed suicide as her mother used to come and had scolded her, the petitioner being the husband has been made victim of the circumstances and as such the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration.

The learned A.P.P. opposes prayer for bail by submitting that other witnesses have supported the allegation. In the facts and circumstances as stated above, considering the statement of those three witnesses, now the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M-VII, Bhojpur at Ara in Agiaon (G) P.S. Case No. 09 of 2014, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T